ENG102 
Home | Policies | Grade Distribution | Papers | Schedule | Discussion GroupsWebBoard Directions | WebBoard


 

Issue Statement

Overview
In approximately one page double spaced (300 words), summarize and explain the issue you plan to address in your final research paper.

Background
One of the first steps to writing the research paper is deciding what issue you will eventually adopt a position on.  Having explored the topic in some breadth, you will now narrow in on a particular question or controversy.  The key is determining what is and is not an issue.

Issues have certain qualities, which can be (over simplistically) listed thusly:

  • Issues have multiple possible sides.  "Gravity," for example, is not an issue.  Any question of fact, while it must be determined through experimentation, does in theory only have one possible answer.  An issue must have debatable points.

  • At the same time, an issue must be able to be argued with reasoned support to those who do not already hold the position.  "Which religion is the correct one?" is not an issue, for any support relies on matters of faith and feeling.  People may be persuaded to change religions, but a neutral evaluator could not judge between the arguments for one or the other.

  • An issue must be of some consequence to someone.  Now, as I've said over and over again, it doesn't have to be of consequence to everyone, or even a particularly large group of people.  But "what major should I pursue?" is not really an issue to anyone but the writer.  You should be able to identify a group of people to whom this is of consequence.

Identifying your issue is the first step to finding your argument, and can avoid the papers that end up being largely informative rather than argumentative.

Assignment Specifics
In approximately one page double spaced, you must do the following:

  • Identify the issue.  The best way to do this is in the form of a research question.  For example, to use an issue I've been reading about lately (and as always, to go back to comic books):

    • Should comic books be subject to standards of obscenity parallel to other printed material, or parallel to broadcast television?  What, if any, special considerations must be made for the possibility of minors buying adult material in comic books?

  • Next, break the question down by determining what is at the root of the issue.  In rhetoric, we often refer to conjectures, which explore what an issue is about.  For example, the question above might have at its core freedom of expression, or it might have at its core appropriateness of material that is readily available to minors, or it might have at its core the validity of comic books as an artistic medium. Or it might have more than one of thse. Which conjecture(s) I choose will greatly shape my argument.  Lay out the possible conjectures, and discuss which you might pursue.

  • Next, briefly lay out the possible positions - that is, the possible answers to the question. 

  • Next, tell me why it matters.  Who is affected by the current situation?  In the example above, I might say parents, comic writers/publishers/store owners, law enforcement and policy makers, and adult readers of comics all have a distinct stake in the question.  What interests do various groups have?  What is at stake for them?  Who would benefit from change, versus who benefits from the status quo?

Other Requirements
Given the brevity of the assignment, I am not requiring that you use specific sources. I will take as a given that you are reporting general information you have gleaned from your research.  However, I expect that any direct quotations or close paraphrases will be cited.

 

Home | Policies | Grade Distribution | Papers | Schedule | Discussion GroupsWebBoard Directions | WebBoard